Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42811316›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain: determinants of birthweight of term neonates in central Sri Lanka, a low-middle-income country.

M G D V K Kiridana, P D M K C Pathirage, K R P Karunathilake, G U Vidanapathirana, V P Wickramasinghe, C Rathnayake, S U B Tennakoon, N S Kalupahana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M G D V K KiridanaDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. vkiridana@yahoo.co.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3388-1954
P D M K C PathirageDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
K R P KarunathilakeDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
G U VidanapathiranaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
V P WickramasingheDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
C RathnayakeDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
S U B TennakoonDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
N S KalupahanaDepartment of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE.

Funding

National Research Council Sri Lanka NRC-22-003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) is increasing across South Asia, yet maternal underweight also remains a persistent public health concern. Low birthweight (LBW) of newborns too remains a challenge amidst high maternal BMI. Understanding the impact of maternal BMI and gestational weight gain (GWG) on offspring weight is clinically relevant in the setting of double burden of malnutrition, which is underexplored in low-income populations, creating a research gap.

methodsThis prospective cohort study was conducted at Teaching Hospital Peradeniya, Sri Lanka on 1537 pregnant women and their term newborns, to evaluate the association of maternal BMI and GWG with newborn weight across different maternal BMI categories. Pregnant women were recruited by convenient sampling technique from August 2021 to September 2023 and followed up through pregnancy. Newborns were measured at birth. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 27 using Multiple Linear Regression, Spearman Correlation, and Binary Logistic Regression.

resultsPre-pregnancy BMI was higher in, 54.8% and lower in 13.8% of women, respectively. GWG in 55.4% was below the Institute of Medicine recommendation while it was higher in 11.2%. Of the newborns, 14.8% had LBW and 6.12% had high birthweight (HBW). Odds were significantly higher for a high BMI woman to have a HBW neonate (aOR = 2.147; 95% CI: 1.127-4.091, p < 0.05) and an underweight woman to have a LBW neonate (aOR = 1.989 95% CI: 1.184-3.340, p < 0.05) compared to a normal BMI woman. The odds were significantly higher to have LBW newborns to women with inadequate GWG, compared to women with normal GWG (aOR = 1.568, 95% CI: 1.054-2.333, p < 0.05). Both maternal pre-pregnancy BMI (β = 17.44,95% CI: 11.621-23.259) and GWG (β = 14.424, 95% CI: 9.986-18.861) significantly predicted newborn birthweight (p < 0.05).

conclusionPre-pregnancy BMI and GWG positively predicted newborn birthweight. Both high and low pre-pregnancy BMI are associated with HBW and LBW, respectively and inadequate GWG is associated with LBW newborns. Strategic planning to achieve healthy pre-pregnancy BMI among women of childbearing age and to optimize GWG across all maternal BMI categories are recommended as priorities in delivering maternal and child healthcare.

Indexed as

Birth WeightBody Mass IndexGestational Weight GainAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyProspective StudiesSri LankaYoung AdultHigh BMIInadequate gestational weight gainLow-birthweightPre-pregnancy body mass indexSri LankaUnderweight

Identifiers

PMID42811316
PMCPMC13621682

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.