ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Transitioning from efgartigimod to tacrolimus in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: a prospective case series.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To describe the clinical outcomes of transitioning from efgartigimod to tacrolimus in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) patients. Six patients who completed the ADHERE trial and maintained clinical stability during the open-label extension phase (≥30 weeks of weekly efgartigimod) were transitioned to oral tacrolimus following efgartigimod discontinuation and were followed at 3-month intervals for 12 months. Clinical effectiveness was assessed utilizing the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability scale, centile Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (cI-RODS), Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score (0-60), grip strength, 3m-Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) as well as electrophysiological examination. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events. Peripheral T and B lymphocytes, interleukins and immunoglobulin levels were measured at each visit, and tacrolimus trough levels were monitored during follow-up. Three of six patients completed 12-month follow-up and achieved clinical stability or improvement by month 12. Two discontinued within three months due to poor clinical response and regained improvement following transition back to intravenous immunoglobulin or efgartigimod. One expressed a preference for traditional Chinese medicine and was lost to follow-up. No severe adverse events were observed. Oral tacrolimus may be a potential maintenance approach for sustaining clinical stability in a subset of CIDP patients stabilized on efgartigimod. Longitudinal naive B-cell monitoring warrants further investigation as a potential early indicator of clinical instability during tacrolimus maintenance therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.