ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Exercise rehabilitation adherence and associated factors in patients aged ≥75 years with hemorrhagic stroke: a mixed-methods study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients aged ≥75 years with hemorrhagic stroke are at high risk of functional impairment and poor recovery. Exercise rehabilitation is essential for restoring physical function, but adherence to exercise rehabilitation may be associated with multiple factors in this population. This study aimed to investigate exercise rehabilitation adherence and its associated factors among patients aged ≥75 years with hemorrhagic stroke using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach. Methods: A total of 254 patients aged ≥75 years with hemorrhagic stroke were recruited by convenience sampling between July 2024 and May 2025. Data were collected using a general information questionnaire, the Stroke Functional Exercise Adherence Scale, the Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, and the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale. Univariate analysis and multinomial logistic regression were conducted to identify factors associated with adherence. Subsequently, 13 patients were purposively selected for semi-structured interviews to explore the experiences underlying the quantitative findings. Qualitative data were analyzed using Colaizzi's seven-step method. Results: The mean adherence score was 37.97 ± 10.57. Overall, 20.87, 29.53, and 49.60% of participants demonstrated low, moderate, and high adherence, respectively. Multinomial logistic regression showed that higher rehabilitation self-efficacy was associated with lower odds of low adherence. In contrast, greater illness uncertainty and disease duration ≤6 months were associated with higher odds of low adherence. Greater illness uncertainty, male sex, and disease duration ≤6 months were also associated with moderate adherence. Qualitative analysis identified three themes underlying adherence: cognition and attitudes toward exercise rehabilitation, psychological and emotional disturbances, and external support. Conclusion: Exercise rehabilitation adherence varied among patients aged ≥75 years with hemorrhagic stroke and was associated with disease duration, rehabilitation self-efficacy, illness uncertainty, and sex. The qualitative findings further indicated that patients' cognition and attitudes, psychological and emotional experiences, and external support shaped their engagement in rehabilitation. These findings highlight the potential value of tailored interventions addressing these multidimensional factors to support engagement in exercise rehabilitation among this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.