ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2026
Developing European policy on xenotransplantation: instructive findings from the first representative UK sample survey on attitudes and views on animal to human transplants.
Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent landmark advances, particularly those related to gene-editing technology and the pioneering pig-to-human transplants currently underway in the USA and China, mean that xenotransplantation (XTx) may become a realistic option for patients waiting for human organ transplants in the foreseeable future. XTx policy needs to be informed by understanding what the public thinks. We undertook what we believe to be the first representative population survey in the United Kingdom of attitudes and views towards XTx. Sixty-five percent of respondents were supportive. Fifty-nine percent would be willing to accept a transplant from a pig. The main concerns related to genetic modification and animal welfare. Public support was subject to rigorous oversight of safety and animal welfare by an independent regulator. There were significant differences in view related to age, sex, ethnicity, educational qualifications and religion with women, people from Black and Asian minority groups and Muslims less supportive of XTx. These findings highlight the importance of demonstrating to the public that XTx can be provided safely while ensuring high standards of animal welfare. We propose reproducing this survey in other European countries would enable comparative analysis and adapting it to incorporate professional opinion may help inform the development of XTx policy and practice in Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.