Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42812368›Full record

ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2026

Developing European policy on xenotransplantation: instructive findings from the first representative UK sample survey on attitudes and views on animal to human transplants.

Mustafa Al-Haboubi, Paul Boadu, Agata Pacho, Nicholas Mays, Antonia J Cronin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mustafa Al-Haboubi *Policy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit (PIRU), Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Paul Boadu *Policy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit (PIRU), Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Agata PachoPolicy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit (PIRU), Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Nicholas MaysPolicy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit (PIRU), Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Antonia J CroninGuy's and St. Thomas', Transplant Renal and Urology Directorate, 6th Floor Borough Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent landmark advances, particularly those related to gene-editing technology and the pioneering pig-to-human transplants currently underway in the USA and China, mean that xenotransplantation (XTx) may become a realistic option for patients waiting for human organ transplants in the foreseeable future. XTx policy needs to be informed by understanding what the public thinks. We undertook what we believe to be the first representative population survey in the United Kingdom of attitudes and views towards XTx. Sixty-five percent of respondents were supportive. Fifty-nine percent would be willing to accept a transplant from a pig. The main concerns related to genetic modification and animal welfare. Public support was subject to rigorous oversight of safety and animal welfare by an independent regulator. There were significant differences in view related to age, sex, ethnicity, educational qualifications and religion with women, people from Black and Asian minority groups and Muslims less supportive of XTx. These findings highlight the importance of demonstrating to the public that XTx can be provided safely while ensuring high standards of animal welfare. We propose reproducing this survey in other European countries would enable comparative analysis and adapting it to incorporate professional opinion may help inform the development of XTx policy and practice in Europe.

Indexed as

Transplantation, HeterologousAdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsAnimal WelfareFemaleHealth PolicyHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgan TransplantationPublic OpinionSurveys and QuestionnairesSwineTissue and Organ ProcurementEuropean policyhealth policyorgan donationpublic attitudesxenotransplantation

Identifiers

PMID42812368
PMCPMC13619536

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.