ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Managing stigma and reconstructing caregiver identity: a qualitative descriptive study of family caregivers of children with cerebral palsy in China.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Family caregivers of children with cerebral palsy may encounter stigma alongside substantial caregiving demands. However, less is known about how they experience and manage stigma in everyday social encounters and reconstruct a valued caregiver identity. This study aimed to explore these experiences among family caregivers of children with cerebral palsy in China. Methods: A qualitative descriptive design was used. Twenty family caregivers were recruited from a tertiary hospital in China using purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured, one-to-one interviews and analysed using inductive content analysis. Results: Twenty family caregivers participated in the study. Analysis generated four themes: (1) becoming a caregiver: disrupted expectations and expanded family roles; (2) living under the gaze: stigma and social judgment in public and family encounters; (3) managing stigma in everyday interactions: concealment, disclosure, and resistance; and (4) rebuilding a valued caregiver identity through responsibility, support, and meaning-making. Caregivers experienced public/enacted stigma, stigma by association, anticipated stigma and, in some accounts, internalized affiliate stigma. They used context-dependent strategies to manage stigma, while continued caregiving, children's small gains, and supportive relationships helped sustain a valued caregiver identity despite uncertainty about the future. Conclusion: Stigma-related experiences extended beyond internalized affiliate stigma and were embedded in everyday social relationships. Family-centered, stigma-sensitive care should address stigma-related challenges across family, community, and service contexts while strengthening support that affirms caregivers' value and identity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.