ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Efgartigimod for Guillain-Barré syndrome: rationale, clinical evidence, and future perspectives.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute immune-mediated peripheral neuropathy characterized by rapidly progressive symmetric limb weakness and diminished tendon reflexes, which may be complicated by respiratory muscle paralysis in severe cases. Current first-line treatments primarily consist of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasma exchange (PE), but approximately 20% of patients have an incomplete response to standard therapies. Additionally, issues such as limited supply of blood products, adverse reactions, and contraindications may limit conventional treatments. Efgartigimod alfa is an engineered human IgG1 Fc fragment that targets the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) and competitively inhibits FcRn-mediated lgG recycling, thereby promoting the lysosomal degradation of circulating IgG, including pathogenic IgG autoantibodies, and reducing serum IgG levels. Intravenous efgartigimod alfa is approved for AChR antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), whereas the U.S. approval for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) applies to the subcutaneous efgartigimod alfa/hyaluronidase co-formulation. Neither formulation is currently approved for GBS. Because IgG-mediated autoimmunity contributes to the pathogenesis of a subset of GBS, FcRn blockade provides a biologically plausible therapeutic strategy; however, its relevance may vary according to the underlying immunopathology. This narrative review summarizes the mechanistic rationale, preliminary clinical evidence, and available safety observations regarding efgartigimod in GBS, critically evaluates the limitations of the current evidence, and discusses unresolved questions and priorities for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.