ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
StrucNS reveals interaction-weighted network topology as the driving predictor of absolute stability of natural and de novo proteins.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationFolded protein function requires stability, yet mapping structure and sequence to a fitness landscape remains difficult. The protein fold is the physical realization of complex, spatially-sensitive physicochemical interactions; quantitatively elucidating how these subtle relationships dictate thermodynamic stability remains challenging. We present StrucNS, a mathematical framework that identifies principles governing protein fitness by employing network science to learn physicochemical relationships between residues and their stability contributions directly from the protein fold. While the fold is traditionally viewed as the phenotypic consequence of the underlying chemical forces, we represent the fold as a network topology to decode the physicochemical dependencies that govern protein stability. Unlike language models reliant on high-dimensional evolutionary embeddings, StrucNS extracts these signals directly from the interaction-weighted network topology. Evolutionary independence uniquely suits StrucNS for de novo design prediction.
resultsDespite reduced dimensionality and training depth, StrucNS outperforms unsupervised ESM-2 and ProteinMPNN on predicting mutational stability across three miniprotein test sets. StrucNS performs comparably to supervised UniRep in predicting absolute stability of de novo designs and outperforms supervised UniRep and supervised ESM-2 in predicting mutational stability of multi mutants far outside its training regime. Feature analysis reveals network topology drive predictive power. SHAP analysis reveals high degree and low modularity of polar/hydrophobic mixed subnetworks as influential features, which highlights connectivity between the hydrophobic core and protein surface as predictive of stability contrary to the conventional focus on the hydrophobic core. Revelation of predictive topological features underscores the utility of interpretability. AVAILABILITY: Source codes and datasets: https://github.com/Hackel-Group-CEMS/StrucNS and https://zenodo.org/records/20497907.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42813977What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.