Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42814270›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2026

Eculizumab and Ravulizumab During Pregnancy in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder and Myasthenia Gravis: Balancing Maternal Disease Control and Fetal Safety.

Eva Dhupia, Jennifer A McCombe, Sean J Pittock, Nabeela Nathoo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eva DhupiaDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0116-9953
Jennifer A McCombeDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9581-5090
Sean J PittockDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6140-5584
Nabeela NathooDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. nnathoo@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6446-1146

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aquaporin-4-immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG)-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and acetylcholine receptor-IgG (AchR-IgG)-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) are complement-mediated neurological diseases that affect women of childbearing age and are associated with disease activity during pregnancy and postpartum. Disease relapses during these periods can result in substantial maternal morbidity, making treatment continuation an important clinical consideration. Complement-targeting monoclonal antibodies, eculizumab and ravulizumab, have demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing disease activity in both conditions. However, evidence regarding their safety during pregnancy remains limited as pregnant women are routinely excluded from clinical trials. This review synthesizes evidence on the safety of complement-targeting monoclonal antibodies during pregnancy in NMOSD and gMG and contextualizes these findings with systemic complement-mediated diseases (paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria [PNH] and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome [aHUS]). Available reports in NMOSD and gMG include a small number of pregnancies exposed to eculizumab or ravulizumab, with no consistent pattern of major maternal or fetal adverse outcomes identified across the reported cases. Larger cohort studies in PNH and aHUS with eculizumab use in pregnancy demonstrate live birth rates ranging from 66 to 100% and maternal outcomes comparable to the general population. Although these findings contribute to the available pregnancy safety data, important biological and clinical differences between neurological and hematological complement-mediated diseases limit direct extrapolation. In the absence of prospective data and disease-specific studies, complement inhibition during pregnancy may be considered in women with high-risk disease requiring sustained control, following individualized risk-benefit assessment. Multidisciplinary management and infection risk mitigation are essential.

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.