ArticleeLife2026
Learning is a fundamental source of individuality.
Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Learning and memory are essential components of our individuality. While it is established that behaviour can vary across genetically identical individuals, it remains unknown how much of this variation stems from momentary experience during learning compared to genetics and its past interactions with the environment. To address this, we measured behaviour in thousands of flies from 90 genetic backgrounds while they performed tasks in conditions that either did or did not require learning. Flies that were genetically identical, raised under the same conditions, and tested simultaneously in the same environment persistently modified the extent of expressed individuality when they could learn. This learning-induced residual expression of individuality and its dynamics were subdued or absent in innate, learning-independent behaviours. We could quantify and then recreate this phenomenon in computer simulations. The emergence of in silico behaviour individuality was most consistent with the individuality of real flies once we enabled reinforced learning in simulated agents. Moreover, we showed that minor differences in initial conditions of the experiment can exacerbate the expression of individuality within a genotype in a learning-dependent manner. Our results establish that besides the classical genotype × environment (G × E) interactions shared between individuals in the past, learning from individual momentary experience further extends the expression of individuality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.