ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
PEtab Select: Specification standard and supporting software for automated model selection.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A central question in mathematical modeling of biological systems is determining which processes are most relevant and how they can be described. There are often competing hypotheses, which yield different models. Model comparison requires parameter optimization and sampling methods. Yet, standards for the specification of model selection problems and the swift evaluation of a broad spectrum of approaches are not available. PEtab Select addresses this challenge by providing a concise, standardized specification of model selection and its associated calibration problems through a new file format standard and software package. The standard facilitates the compact representation of even very large model selection problems; in one example, billions of model alternatives. PEtab Select builds on the PEtab standard for the specification of parameter estimation problems, and enables the use of state-of-the-art modelling and calibration workflows utilizing COPASI, Data2Dynamics, PEtab.jl, and pyPESTO. PEtab Select supports common model selection criteria (e.g., Akaike and Bayesian information criteria) and can be easily extended to use others. To ensure flexibility, PEtab Select implements several model space exploration approaches, including basic brute-force, forward, and backward selection, and also advanced, flexible selection methods. PEtab Select introduces the first standardization of model selection tasks, filling a critical gap in existing computational pipelines. It constitutes an essential contribution to FAIR research software in systems biology by promoting interoperability and reusability in model selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.