ArticleBMJ open2026
Development and validation of an AI-enhanced prediction model for 3-year visual decline in patients with diabetes using ophthalmic imaging: protocol for a real-world longitudinal cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of visual impairment among working-age adults worldwide. Existing artificial intelligence (AI) studies have mainly focused on automated diagnosis and grading of DR or diabetic macular oedema while relatively few studies have investigated long-term prediction of visual outcomes. In clinical practice, patients and clinicians are more concerned about whether future visual decline will occur rather than merely identifying the current presence of DR. This study aims to develop and validate a real-world prognostic model integrating AI-derived imaging scores, ophthalmic examinations and systemic clinical variables to predict 3-year visual decline in patients with diabetes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This retrospective longitudinal cohort study will use routinely collected ophthalmic imaging and clinical data from Peking University Third Hospital for model development and internal validation, with independent external validation planned using data from Ningbo Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University. The development cohort will cover the period from 1 January 2018 to 1 May 2026. Eligible eyes will have baseline colour fundus photography (CFP) and/or optical coherence tomography (OCT), baseline best-corrected visual acuity and at least one follow-up visual acuity record within 3 years after the index date. CFP-enhanced analyses will include eyes with eligible CFP, OCT-enhanced analyses will include eyes with eligible OCT and multimodal analyses will require eligible paired CFP and OCT. The primary outcome will be time to first visual decline within 3 years, defined as an increase in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) best-corrected visual acuity of ≥0.2 from baseline in the same eye. Sustained visual decline, requiring confirmation of a ≥0.2-logMAR deterioration at a subsequent eligible visit, will be evaluated as a key secondary outcome. AI-derived imaging scores will be generated using prespecified modality-specific and multimodal retinal image models. Separate CFP and OCT models will generate continuous CFP-derived and OCT-derived imaging scores, while a prespecified multimodal model jointly integrating paired CFP and OCT information will generate a single continuous multimodal imaging score. These imaging scores will be incorporated separately into prespecified AI-enhanced prognostic models together with demographic, systemic and ophthalmic predictors. Cox regression, penalised Cox regression and exploratory machine learning survival models will be developed and internally validated and the final prognostic model will be externally evaluated in an independent cohort from Ningbo Eye Hospital. Performance will be evaluated using discrimination, calibration, Brier score and decision curve analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of Peking University Third Hospital (approval number: IRB00006761-M20260399). All data will be de-identified before analysis. The findings of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.