ArticleNature communications2026
Multilayer MEG source modelling enables depth-resolved laminar inference in humans.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neural dynamics at the laminar level are critical for cortical computation. However, in humans, non-invasive methods to probe such dynamics have been limited to coarse distinctions between deep and superficial layers. Here, we present a multilayer magnetoencephalography source reconstruction framework and evaluate the conditions under which depth-resolved laminar inference may be feasible. Using simulations, we systematically assess the limits of magnetoencephalography depth resolution, showing that laminar discrimination depends on sufficiently high signal-to-noise ratio, precise co-registration, and accurate specification of cortical column orientation. We demonstrate that regional variations in cortical anatomy influence reconstruction fidelity, with lead-field separability emerging as a key determinant. We then apply this framework to empirical data from three independent datasets and find laminar activation patterns that align with canonical feedforward and feedback motifs in visual and sensorimotor circuits, supporting the plausibility of laminar inference under favorable conditions and offering opportunities to bridge invasive electrophysiology and human neuroimaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.