Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42816729›Full record

ArticleLearning & behavior2026

Learning in plants: A conceptual and experimental primer.

Aditya Ponkshe, Charles I Abramson, Paco Calvo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aditya PonksheMinimal Intelligence Lab (MINTLab), Department of Philosophy, University of Murcia, Edificio Luis Vives, Campus de Espinardo, 30100, Murcia, Spain. ponkshe.aditya@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6242-3760
Charles I AbramsonLaboratory of Comparative Psychology and Behavioral Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8961-3089
Paco CalvoMinimal Intelligence Lab (MINTLab), Department of Philosophy, University of Murcia, Edificio Luis Vives, Campus de Espinardo, 30100, Murcia, Spain. fjcalvo@um.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6196-7560

Funding

V. Kann Rasmussen Foundation 'Behavioral Evidence for Plant Consciousness (BE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether plants are capable of associative learning remains a contested question, often complicated by conceptual ambiguity and methodological limitations. This article provides a critical and constructive primer on how to investigate associative learning in plants within a rigorous experimental framework. We begin by clarifying the concept of associative learning and distinguishing it from related phenomena such as habituation, sensitisation, and pseudo-conditioning. We then identify a set of minimal behavioural prerequisites that any system must satisfy to support associative processes. Evidence from plant biology indicates that plants possess these prerequisite capacities across multiple temporal and organisational scales. We further review historical and recent experimental attempts to demonstrate associative learning in plants, highlighting recurring methodological limitations. Building on principles from the experimental analysis of behaviour, we outline key design requirements for plant-conditioning studies, including identifying appropriate unconditioned stimulus-response (US-UR) complexes, operationalising conditioned stimuli, and implementing controls to rule out non-associative explanations. As we argue, adequately controlled experiments have not yet provided robust evidence for associative learning in plants, leaving open whether these capacities are integrated in ways that enable plants to form learned associations. By integrating behavioural theory with advances in plant physiology and imaging, future research can move beyond suggestive findings toward decisive tests. More broadly, this work contributes to a functionally grounded understanding of learning that does not presuppose a nervous system, thereby expanding the comparative scope of cognition across living systems.

Indexed as

BehaviourConditioningLearningPlants

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.