ArticleBrain and behavior2026
Reliability, Validity, and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Persian Six-Item Cognitive Impairment Test (6-CIT) in Older Adult Outpatients.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEarly detection of neurocognitive disorders is crucial for timely intervention in older adults. The Six-Item Cognitive Impairment Test (6-CIT) is a brief screening tool designed for rapid cognitive assessment, but a validated Persian version has not been available to date. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and psychometrically evaluate the Persian version of the 6-CIT among Iranian older adults.
methodsIn this prospective cross-sectional psychometric validation and diagnostic accuracy study, 180 participants aged ≥ 60 years were recruited from outpatient geriatric clinics and categorized into three equal groups: normal cognition, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and dementia. Diagnoses were established by a geriatric psychiatrist using DSM-5 criteria, and severity was staged using the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) criteria. Reliability was assessed through internal consistency (Cronbach's α) and test-retest stability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC 3,1). Validity was examined via convergent validity with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and exploratory principal component analysis (PCA). Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and Youden's J index.
resultsThe Persian 6-CIT demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.836) and strong test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.849). A strong negative correlation with the MMSE supported convergent validity (ρ = -0.919, p < 0.001). PCA supported a unidimensional structure explaining 71.72% of the total variance. ROC analysis for dementia yielded an AUC of 0.984 (95% CI: 0.961-1.000); a cutoff score of ≥ 11 provided 96.7% sensitivity and 85.8% specificity, while a cutoff of ≥ 14 maximized overall mathematical accuracy (93.3% sensitivity, 94.2% specificity). Furthermore, diagnostic accuracy for MCI was also high (AUC = 0.976, 95% CI: 0.947-0.997), with an optimal cutoff of ≥ 2 yielding 96.7% sensitivity and 96.7% specificity.
conclusionsThe Persian 6-CIT is a brief, reliable, and valid instrument for screening both MCI and dementia among Iranian older adults in specialized outpatient settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.