ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Adaptive Convolutional Neural Network-Enhanced Scale-Fusion Network for Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning has achieved notable success in sensor-based human activity recognition (SHAR), yet wearable inertial signals contain activity patterns at different temporal scales while practical deployment imposes strict computational constraints. This paper proposes a three-stage Adaptive CNN-Enhanced Scale-fusion Network (ACESNet) for six-channel accelerometer-gyroscope activity recognition. The Adaptive Kernel Encoder dynamically combines temporal kernels of different sizes, while the CNN-Enhanced Scale-fusion design combines multi-scale temporal mixing, explicit channel mixing and a parallel local CNN path without materializing a global attention matrix. The main benchmark uses a fixed stratified 70/15/15 window-level partition (split seed 42), and all methods in the main comparison are repeated over five training seeds. On REALWORLD, MotionSense, UCI-HAR and SHL, ACESNet achieves accuracies of 95.37 ± 0.09%, 99.33 ± 0.12%, 98.01 ± 0.23% and 93.49 ± 0.10%, with Macro-F1 scores of 95.59 ± 0.09%, 99.12 ± 0.15%, 98.16 ± 0.21% and 94.03 ± 0.08%, respectively. A separate official subject-independent UCI-HAR evaluation yields 94.01 ± 0.84% accuracy and 94.11 ± 0.88% Macro-F1. The adaptive-kernel selector has a mean normalized entropy of 0.9114, providing evidence against severe single-branch collapse rather than strong kernel selectivity. On a Raspberry Pi 5 (Raspberry Pi Ltd., Cambridge, UK), ACESNet requires 8.731 MFLOPs and 1.606 ± 0.014 ms per window in FP32 ONNX Runtime 1.18.1. These results support a favorable performance-efficiency trade-off relative to the selected baselines under the stated protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.