ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026
Identifying adaptive variation in spatially structured populations using low-coverage whole-genome sequencing data.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Successful implementation of evolutionary programs to rescue climatically threatened species requires identification of adaptive variation. Although many genotype-environment association methods have been successful in identifying adaptive variation, current approaches can be improved in two important aspects. First, most existing methods do not account for genotype uncertainty in widely available low-coverage whole-genome sequencing data. Researchers often restrict analysis to loci for which genotypes can be inferred reliably or call the most probable genotype, allowing the use of genotype-based methods. However, discarding data and false genotype calls increase the uncertainty in estimates of genetic variation and can introduce systematic biases. Second, most methods use phenomenological approaches, such as logistic regression, to partition estimated variation into adaptive and nonadaptive components. Consequently, current approaches may fail to account for evolutionary processes, such as migration-selection balance. Structured migration between climatically disparate locations can produce deviations from a smooth S-shaped response curve, which can be difficult to accommodate using generalized linear models. To overcome these challenges, we developed a method that accounts for genotype uncertainty in sequencing data and propagates this uncertainty to inform the parameters of an evolutionary model. A key feature of this model is that it describes mechanistically how genetic variation arises from joint interactions between local adaptation, structured migration, mutation, and drift. Our synthetic simulation tests reveal that accounting for genotype uncertainty and structured migration substantially reduces false negatives. We also applied our approach to analyze data on North American rosy-finches (3.7 million SNPs), a high-alpine, climatically threatened clade of bird species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.