Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42818122›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Brain Mechanisms of Lexicality in Bilingual Emotion Processing.

Cheng Xiao, Jiang Liu, Yuqi Zhang, Wanzhi Lyu, Rutvik H Desai, Ma Feilong

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cheng XiaoDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-5057-9143
Jiang LiuLinguistics Program, University of South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-2598-2165
Yuqi ZhangDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College.ORCID 0009-0002-0687-1096
Wanzhi LyuDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina.ORCID 0009-0004-2038-4512
Rutvik H DesaiDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-7937-5109
Ma FeilongDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-6838-3971

Funding

Semantic SystemsR01DC017162 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI DESAI, RUTVIK H · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how native speakers and second language (L2) learners process language differently is fundamental to theories of language acquisition, comprehension, and use. A central debate in this literature concerns the inconsistent findings in emotional prosody processing between native speakers and L2 learners, partly attributable to stimulus lexicality: some studies use real words, whereas others use pseudowords. To resolve this discrepancy, we measured fMRI responses in 15 native speakers and 15 L2 learners while they listened to Mandarin real-word and pseudoword stimuli. Both groups engaged in overlapping auditory, cognitive, and affective regions, including the auditory cortex, inferior frontal cortex, superior temporal cortex, and the temporoparietal junction. However, the two groups showed distinct responses depending on lexicality: native speakers showed stronger recruitment of temporal regions for pseudowords, whereas L2 learners showed greater frontoparietal activation for real words. These patterns were consistent across positive and negative prosody conditions. Furthermore, among L2 learners, higher proficiency was associated with greater frontal activation for real words, but not pseudowords. Together, these findings demonstrate that the differences between native speakers and L2 learners depend critically on stimulus lexicality, highlighting the role of lexicality in bilingual emotion processing.

Identifiers

PMID42818122
PMCPMC13622102

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.