Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42818550›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

ABEL: an active-learning behavior estimation and labeling platform.

Jobe L Ritchie, Brianna E George, Alison V Roland, Caroline G Krieman, Brooke N Bender, Maya R Eberle, Grace A Stys, William C Der, Lili S Kooyman, Adriane M Lawes and 6 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jobe L RitchieBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-5270-8877
Brianna E GeorgeBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-5234-0889
Alison V RolandBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-5918-6901
Caroline G KriemanBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0009-0002-8206-9708
Brooke N BenderBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-3296-6144
Maya R EberleBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-2107-5872
Grace A StysBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0009-0006-5512-5494
William C DerBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0009-0008-9844-676X
Lili S KooymanBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0009-0005-3790-3902
Adriane M LawesBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0009-0004-6206-1586
Rajon T ScottBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0009-0007-9019-1304
Todd K O'BuckleyBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-8723-734X
Marissa M R McLeanBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-4075-2883
Chloe J GallagherBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0009-0008-4701-2806
Joyce BesheerBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-6187-8376
Thomas L KashBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-4747-4495

Funding

SEEDING POSTDOCTORAL INNOVATORS IN RESEARCH &EDUCATIONK12GM000678 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DONALD T LYSLE, Kathryn Joanna Reissner · 1999 to 2026
$30.9M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN THE NEUROSCIENCEST32NS007431 · NINDS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Juan Song, Mark J. Zylka · 1997 to 2026
$10.0M
Supplement to Molecular and Cellular Studies on Alcohol's ActionsT32AA007573 · NIAAA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FULTON T CREWS, Thomas L. Kash · 1997 to 2026
$9.3M
Characterization of alcohol self-administration following predator odor exposure: relevance to PTSD-Diversity SupplementR01AA026537 · NIAAA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Joyce Besheer · 2017 to 2026
$3.9M
The role of corticotropin releasing factor in binge-like ethanol drinkingR01AA022048 · NIAAA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Thomas L. Kash, TODD Eric THIELE · 2013 to 2026
$3.2M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA022048NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA026537NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007573NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM000678NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detailed behavior analysis is essential for thorough characterization of ethologically relevant behaviors in model organisms, yet manual annotation of the full behavioral repertoire remains subjective, time intensive, and susceptible to observer error. Advances in machine learning have enabled high-throughput pose estimation on recorded video, but tools for behavior classification from pose and video data are still developing. Instead of hand-scoring every frame of video, experimenters can instead label a small subset of video frames and software trained through machine learning makes predictions on the rest. Here, we present an Active-learning Behavior Estimation and Labeling (ABEL) platform that uses clip-level active learning (i.e., human labeling of short video snippets) with multimodal features (pose, video, context/ROI) to train robust behavior classifiers. We rigorously validated ABEL-derived behavior predictions against expert human observers and field-standard automated software, across diverse rodent behavioral assays. Across eight assays and 45 behaviors, model training required 19.5 hours of human annotation in total, with the reviewer scoring ~8% of available video. Models trained in ABEL achieved a mean precision-recall area under the curve (PR-AUC - a 0-1 score of how well a model balances missed detections against false alarms, with 1 being perfect) of 0.90 (SD 0.09, range 0.60-0.99), with no association between performance and behavior prevalence (r = 0.20). This was aided by custom tools, Essence Extractor and UMAP Interactive Selection, for targeted discovery of high probability clips which reduce the clip review needed to find a rare behavior 6-fold relative to random sampling and 10-fold relative to labeling whole videos. As a biological validation, we assessed how ABEL-derived behaviors relate to underlying neuronal calcium dynamics. Behavior labels were tightly synced with neuronal signatures distinct from ambiguous behavior and randomly chosen, behavior-unrelated time windows (shuffle control). Together, these data indicate that ABEL provides an efficient platform for frame-precise classification of distinct ethologically relevant behaviors.

Indexed as

active-learningbehavior classificationfiber photometryMachine learningrodent behavior

Identifiers

PMID42818550
PMCPMC13622494

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.