ArticleResearch square2026
Fisher-information limits of detector-bandwidth-efficient 3D light-field microscopy.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Light-field microscopy enables snapshot volumetric imaging, but its information rate is constrained by both optical encoding and detector readout architecture. Here we develop a task-dependent Fisher-information framework that evaluates optical encoders relative to the detector resource limiting acquisition throughput. We compare full Fourier light-field microscopy (FLFM), squeezed light-field microscopy (SLIM), and frame-rate-matched FLFM under a common optical geometry, photon budget, and row-limited camera model. Sparse scenes are analyzed using a 3D point-emitter Fisher matrix, and dense scenes using Fourier-mode information on tilted spectral slices. At a compression factor of 0.25, SLIM provides 2.40× higher axial Fisher information per camera bandwidth and 1.89× higher 3D D-optimal position information than frame-rate-matched FLFM. For dense scenes, it provides 1.85× higher integrated Fourier-mode Fisher information per bandwidth, 4× greater axial-frequency extent, and approximately 11× larger projected lateral hard-support area. Sweeps over compression factor and view tilt show that these advantages reflect a general detector-allocation principle rather than a specific operating point. More broadly, the framework can be adapted to other camera architectures by incorporating architecture-specific measurement models and detector-throughput costs, providing a general basis for co-designing optical encoding, scene statistics, and camera readout.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.