Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42818925›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Fisher-information limits of detector-bandwidth-efficient 3D light-field microscopy.

Liang Gao

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Liang GaoDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095.ORCID 0000-0002-4296-5586

Funding

Ultrafast BioimagingR35GM128761 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI Liang Gao · 2018 to 2026
$3.2M
Kilohertz volumetric imaging of neuronal action potentials in awake behaving miceRF1NS128488 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GAO, LIANG, GOLSHANI, PEYMAN · 2022 to 2022
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128761NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS128488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Light-field microscopy enables snapshot volumetric imaging, but its information rate is constrained by both optical encoding and detector readout architecture. Here we develop a task-dependent Fisher-information framework that evaluates optical encoders relative to the detector resource limiting acquisition throughput. We compare full Fourier light-field microscopy (FLFM), squeezed light-field microscopy (SLIM), and frame-rate-matched FLFM under a common optical geometry, photon budget, and row-limited camera model. Sparse scenes are analyzed using a 3D point-emitter Fisher matrix, and dense scenes using Fourier-mode information on tilted spectral slices. At a compression factor of 0.25, SLIM provides 2.40× higher axial Fisher information per camera bandwidth and 1.89× higher 3D D-optimal position information than frame-rate-matched FLFM. For dense scenes, it provides 1.85× higher integrated Fourier-mode Fisher information per bandwidth, 4× greater axial-frequency extent, and approximately 11× larger projected lateral hard-support area. Sweeps over compression factor and view tilt show that these advantages reflect a general detector-allocation principle rather than a specific operating point. More broadly, the framework can be adapted to other camera architectures by incorporating architecture-specific measurement models and detector-throughput costs, providing a general basis for co-designing optical encoding, scene statistics, and camera readout.

Indexed as

3D microscopycamera bandwidthcomputational imagingCramér-Rao boundFisher informationFLFMFourier slicelight-field microscopySLIM

Identifiers

PMID42818925
PMCPMC13622839

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.