Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42819015›Full record

ArticleEvolution, medicine, and public health2026

Exploring tumorigenesis as a process of phenotypic state-space exploration and selective funneling.

Frédéric Thomas, Michael L Wong, Robert M Hazen, Antoine M Dujon, Klara Asselin, Jordan Meliani, Beata Ujvari, Mario Campone, Pascal Pujol, Catherine Alix-Panabières and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution, medicine, and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Frédéric ThomasCREEC/CANECEV, MIVEGEC (CREES) Department, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2238-1978
Michael L WongEarth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8212-3036
Robert M HazenEarth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4163-8644
Antoine M DujonCREEC/CANECEV, MIVEGEC (CREES) Department, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Klara AsselinCREEC/CANECEV, MIVEGEC (CREES) Department, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Jordan MelianiCREEC/CANECEV, MIVEGEC (CREES) Department, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Beata UjvariEarth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2391-2988
Mario CamponeInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie, Saint Herblain, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5196-5908
Pascal PujolCREEC/CANECEV, MIVEGEC (CREES) Department, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Catherine Alix-PanabièresCREEC/CANECEV, MIVEGEC (CREES) Department, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Jean-Pascal CappToulouse Biotechnology Institute University of Toulouse, INSA, CNRS, INRAE, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6470-079X
Aurora M NedelcuDepartment of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumorigenesis is widely studied within evolutionary frameworks, yet integrating genetic, non-genetic, spatial, and collective tumor-level dynamics into a unified description remains challenging. Here, we propose that tumorigenesis can be analyzed as a process in which tumors generate, explore, and filter phenotypic and organizational configurations over time. We use the concepts of phenotypic state-space exploration, selective funneling, and selection for function as an operational framework to describe how tumor systems diversify, become constrained, and stabilize or lose functional organization during cancer progression. In this view, tumors are not only populations of competing clones, but also dynamic systems whose persistence depends on plasticity, tissue constraints, spatial organization, and collective functional states. This perspective helps account for phenotypic plasticity, recurrent tumor architectures, and the emergence of collective properties such as group phenotypic composition. It also generates testable predictions, including convergence toward recurrent functional states, therapy-induced reorganization of accessible phenotypic space, and the disproportionate effect of disrupting key collective functions. By mapping these concepts onto tumor biology, we position cancer as a tractable system for studying constraint-driven tumor evolution and for informing therapeutic strategies that target tumor organization in addition to individual cancer cells.

Indexed as

cancerevolutionselection for functiontumorigenesis

Identifiers

PMID42819015
PMCPMC13623535

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.