Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42819246›Full record

ReviewPCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2026

Who leaves a suicide note? A systematic review of differences between note writers and non-note writers.

Giulia Gotti, Federica Turolla, Alessandra Bordessa, Claudia Bruni, Fabio Madeddu, Lorenzo Montali, Guendalina Gentile, Riccardo Zoja, Riccardo Primavera, Stefano Tambuzzi and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Giulia GottiDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca Milan Italy.
Federica TurollaDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca Milan Italy.
Alessandra BordessaDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca Milan Italy.
Claudia BruniFamily Counseling Services, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) of Pavia Pavia Italy.
Fabio MadedduDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca Milan Italy.
Lorenzo MontaliDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca Milan Italy.
Guendalina GentileDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health Section of Legal Medicine, University of Milan Milan Italy.
Riccardo ZojaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health Section of Legal Medicine, University of Milan Milan Italy.
Riccardo PrimaveraDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health Section of Legal Medicine, University of Milan Milan Italy.
Stefano TambuzziDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health Section of Legal Medicine, University of Milan Milan Italy.
Cristina CattaneoLABANOF, Laboratory of Forensic Anthropology and Odontology, Institute of Legal Medicine, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health University of Milan Milan Italy.
Raffaella CalatiDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca Milan Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8130-437X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suicide notes represent one of the few first-person sources of information on the suicidal process. However, only a minority of individuals who die by suicide leave a note, raising the question of whether note writers (NW) are representative of the broader population of suicide decedents. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the available evidence on differences between NW and non-note writers (NNW) across sociodemographic, clinical, psychosocial, and suicide-related variables. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and ProQuest databases up to June 22, 2026, following PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they compared NW and NNW on at least one variable, or investigated predictors of note-leaving. Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Evidence was heterogeneous and suggested that NW cannot be clearly distinguished from NNW based on sociodemographic and clinical variables. Concerning suicide-related variables, the method of suicide was the most consistently different between NW and NNW; in particular, the most frequent methods of suicide in NW, compared to NNW, were non-violent methods like poisoning/overdose and gas inhalation. Rather than solely reflecting a distinct psychological profile, suicide note-leaving may also be influenced by the circumstances surrounding the suicidal act. One possible, although untested, explanation is that leaving a note requires a degree of cognitive and emotional organization that may be less compatible with highly disorganized or impulsive suicidal states.

Indexed as

non‐note writersnote writerssuicide note

Identifiers

PMID42819246
PMCPMC13625211

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.