ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Grandparenting, intergenerational coparenting, and mental health of vulnerable children in Chinese families: risks, resilience, and clinical implications.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In China, grandparents serve as primary or co-caregivers for millions of children, particularly those separated from rural-to-urban migrant parents. This short communication synthesizes evidence on how grandparenting quality and intergenerational coparenting dynamics shape the mental health outcomes of vulnerable Chinese children, including those in left-behind, three-generation urban, and dual-income family configurations. We distinguish throughout between children whose parents have both migrated (leaving grandparents as sole custodial caregivers) and children who remain in triadic parent-grandparent-child systems, whether through partial parental migration or co-resident urban caregiving arrangements, as these configurations carry differing implications for grandparenting quality and coparenting dynamics. Evidence from cross-sectional surveys, meta-analytic studies, and dyadic interdependence models indicates that positive grandparenting predicts fewer child behavioral difficulties and greater prosocial competence, whereas coparenting conflict, low coparenting relationship quality, and caregiver depressive symptoms constitute compounding risk pathways. Grandparental warmth, harmonious coparenting, and family resilience are identified as protective mechanisms within a family systems framework. Clinical and nursing implications are discussed, with focus on intergenerational interventions that simultaneously engage grandparents and parents. The present paper argues that mental health professionals and nursing practitioners working with Chinese children should adopt a multigenerational assessment lens, given that standard clinical protocols focused on the parent-child dyad may systematically underestimate intergenerational risk and resilience processes. Culturally adapted, evidence-based coparenting programs represent a priority area for intervention development in Chinese psychiatric and nursing contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.