Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42819437›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026

Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Cross-Sectional Study of Usage Patterns and Perceptions Among Medical Students at a Brazilian Public University.

Arthur Vinicius Ferreira de Lacerda, Stella De Azevedo Ferreira, Ana Cláudia Garcia Rosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arthur Vinicius Ferreira de Lacerda *Medicine Program, Palmas Campus, Federal University of Tocantins, Palmas, Tocantins, Brazil.
Stella De Azevedo Ferreira *Medicine Program, University of Gurupi (UnirG), Gurupi, Tocantins, Brazil.
Ana Cláudia Garcia Rosa *Medicine Program, Palmas Campus, Federal University of Tocantins, Palmas, Tocantins, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8566-3174

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To describe self-reported artificial intelligence (AI) use and perceptions of benefits, risks, and curricular integration among medical students with previous AI contact at a Brazilian public university. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional survey included a convenience sample of 189 students aged 18 years or older in Years 1-4 of medical school who reported previous contact with AI tools applied to medical education. Data were collected from March to July 2026 using a researcher-developed electronic questionnaire without formal validation and summarized descriptively using available responses. Results: Daily or weekly academic AI use was reported by 76.2% (144/189). Exposure to AI as a learning resource in a course was reported by 38.3% (72/188). Perceived improvement in differential diagnosis was reported by 57.8% (108/187), whereas 60.3% (114/189) perceived a risk of harmful dependence affecting human clinical judgment. Optional and controlled curricular integration was preferred by 72.0% (136/189). Conclusion: Among respondents with previous AI contact, frequent use coexisted with perceived benefits and concerns about dependence. These findings can support local discussion and further educational evaluation but do not establish objective learning effects or determine appropriate curricular approaches.

Indexed as

clinical reasoningcurriculum developmentdigital literacylearner attitudestechnology-enhanced learning

Identifiers

PMID42819437
PMCPMC13625836

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.