ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Beyond survival: psychoneuroimmunology-driven cancer psychological rehabilitation-a paradigm shift from symptom management to biobehavioral remodeling.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer treatment paradigms have evolved from solely focusing on tumor eradication to optimizing survivorship trajectories. However, current psychological rehabilitation approaches predominantly target symptom relief, such as anxiety, depression, and fatigue, without direct evidence of influencing cancer's biological processes like recurrence, metastasis, or immune evasion. This review, grounded in psychoneuroimmunology, advocates for elevating psychological rehabilitation from an auxiliary support role to a synergistic component of antitumor therapy. Central to this perspective is redefining rehabilitation endpoints to include immune reconstitution indices and tumor dormancy maintenance capacity. We propose a dynamic "stress-inflammation-immune escape" cycle model and emphasize the development of precision psychological interventions tailored to tumor genetic mutation profiles and associated psychological phenotypes. The article synthesizes three strands of recent evidence: First, clinical translational findings suggesting that psychological interventions may be accompanied by shifts in immunological indices such as the regulatory T cell (Treg)/T helper 17 (Th17) ratio and may correlate with the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors, although the available evidence rests largely on small samples and surrogate endpoints and is insufficient to establish causality; Second, mechanistic findings, derived predominantly from preclinical models, indicating that the brain-bone marrow axis may mediate epigenetic reprogramming of hematopoietic stem cells, the human relevance of which remains to be confirmed; and finally, technological developments such as digital phenotyping that offer exploratory directions for monitoring relapse and psychological deterioration, whose diagnostic performance has not yet been established in prospective studies. By advancing the interdisciplinary field of precision psychoimmuno-oncology, this review aims to establish a low-cost, high-benefit "brain-body combined therapy" paradigm, offering cancer survivors innovative strategies for comprehensive recovery beyond mere symptom control. Importantly, the hypothesis framework proposed herein rests predominantly on surrogate endpoints and preclinical evidence. Until hard endpoints from prospective randomized controlled trials become available, any effect of psychological interventions on tumor biological behavior should be regarded as a scientific hypothesis awaiting verification rather than an established clinical conclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.