ArticleCanadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur2026
Article in Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This case report describes the lived experience of a 66-year-old male (PN) with bilateral knee osteoarthritis whose engagement with best practice conservative management resulted in a positive outcome of unanticipated scope/magnitude. PN had long-term symptomatic knee osteoarthritis and was advised that bilateral arthroplasty was required. He chose to avoid surgery, instead participating in a clinical trial evaluating the effect of embedding pain science education (PSE) into an individualized, graded exercise program (EPIPHA-KNEE trial). Methods: The intervention involved four weekly in-person sessions, five telehealth sessions (weeks 5-8, 12), and two top-up in-person sessions (weeks 21, 39). A key intervention component was activity-related goal setting, with cognitive reconceptualization and activity progression underpinned by PSE. PN set an "aspirational goal" - to walk the Camino de Santiago Trail. Clinical outcomes and device-measured activity levels were assessed at baseline, 8, 26 and 52 weeks. Results: Relative to baseline, PN experienced improvements in knee pain (83% reduction), function (71% improvement), and activity levels (50% increase) at 52 weeks with cessation of pain medication use and resolution of knee swelling and night pain. PN experienced continuing benefit, walking 320 km of the Camino Trial in 14 days one year after trial completion. Conclusion: PN's achievement of his aspirational goal is an exemplar of the unanticipated scope of osteoarthritis improvement with best-practice non-surgical management and is shared via a video interview. Documenting and sharing such inspirational stories with people living with knee osteoarthritis may prove an important source of hope and highlight the change potential for non-surgical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.