ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2026
Development and validation of a serious game for nursing leadership in Primary Health Care.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto develop and validate a serious game for nursing leadership among Primary Health Care nurses.
methodsa methodological, quantitative, descriptive study conducted in two stages: content validity was assessed by 13 experts via e-Delphi, and usability was assessed by 14 nurses using the System Usability Scale and the Serious Educational Game in Nursing Appraisal Scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
resultsthe global Content Validity Index was 0.93. Mean usability score was 92.0; the educational strategy appraisal score was 97.9. The final version of the serious game included a board with an improved layout, 75 revised cards, and refined rules, making it an educational resource applicable to professional practice.
conclusionsthe serious game proved to be a valid educational technology with high usability and was effective in supporting the development of leadership competencies among PHC nurses and may serve as an innovative alternative to traditional educational practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.