Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42821033›Full record

ReviewJournal of computer-aided molecular design2026

Machine learning for discovering anticancer compounds from plants and elucidating their mechanisms.

Chenyu Zhang, Shanxue Jiang, Yushuang Li, Lizhen Ma

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chenyu ZhangSchool of Light Industry Science and Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, 102488, China.
Shanxue JiangSchool of Light Industry Science and Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, 102488, China. jiangshanxue@btbu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3859-3345
Yushuang LiBeijing Academy of Food Sciences, Beijing, 100068, China.
Lizhen MaBeijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, 102206, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 22278006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants are important sources of bioactive compounds with demonstrated anticancer and cancer-preventive properties. However, traditional methods for discovering and deciphering the mechanisms of these compounds are often slow and labor-intensive. The integration of machine learning (ML) provides a computational approach for bioactivity prediction, candidate prioritization, and mechanistic hypothesis generation. Algorithms including support vector machines (SVM) and graph neural networks (GNN) are increasingly employed to support multiple stages from compound screening to experimentally guided mechanistic investigation. Despite these advances, challenges such as data heterogeneity and structural complexity of natural products remain. This review systematically outlines the natural anticancer compounds derived from plants, summarizes the application of machine learning in bioactivity prediction, candidate prioritization, and mechanistic investigation, compares functional-group prevalence and co-occurrence patterns in plant-derived anticancer compounds and FDA-approved anticancer drugs, and identifies current challenges along with future directions for AI-assisted discovery in this field.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBiological ProductsDrug DiscoveryMachine LearningNeoplasmsPlantsGraph Neural NetworksHumansPrediction AlgorithmsSoft ComputingSupport Vector MachineAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBiological ProductsAnticancer compoundsDrug discoveryMachine learningMolecular descriptorsNatural products

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.