Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42821094›Full record

ReviewOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2026

Modern pharmacological management of Osteoporosis: from monotherapy to sequential and combination approaches in postmenopausal women.

Valeria Rella, Cinzia Rotondo, Raffaele Barile, Antonello Trotta, Francesco Paolo Cantatore, Addolorata Corrado

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valeria RellaRheumatology Clinic, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy. valeria.rella92@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6708-9105
Cinzia RotondoRheumatology Clinic, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Raffaele BarileRheumatology Clinic, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Antonello TrottaRheumatology Clinic, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Francesco Paolo CantatoreRheumatology Clinic, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Addolorata CorradoRheumatology Clinic, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is the most frequent systemic skeletal disorder characterized by an increased fracture risk and substantial global burden. While pharmacological therapies, including antiresorptive agents, anabolic agents, and dual-action agents, have demonstrated efficacy in reducing fracture risk and improving bone mineral density, long-term management remains challenging. Limitations, including treatment duration restrictions, safety concerns, rebound phenomena, and incomplete skeletal restoration, have shifted focus from prolonged monotherapy toward strategic therapeutic approaches integrating multiple agents over time. This narrative review examines current osteoporosis pharmacotherapy with emphasis on sequential and combination treatment strategies. Sequential therapy, involving strategic transitions between agents with complementary mechanisms, has emerged as optimal for maximizing and sustaining skeletal benefits. Evidence demonstrates that anabolic-to-antiresorptive sequences produce substantial bone mineral density gains and fracture risk reduction. Conversely, antiresorptive-to-anabolic transitions often result in transient bone loss and attenuated responses. Combination therapy, particularly teriparatide with denosumab, produces greater bone mineral density increases than monotherapy but remains limited by cost, uncertain fracture benefits, and potential cumulative toxicity. Current evidence supports goal-directed, individualized treatment strategies prioritizing sequencing based on fracture risk, prior therapies, and bone turnover status. Optimal regimens typically involve initial bone-forming therapy in high-risk patients, followed by antiresorptive consolidation. Future research should refine sequential protocols, identify predictive biomarkers, establish optimal durations, and conduct adequately powered fracture trials to validate strategic approaches over traditional monotherapy.

Indexed as

Bone mineral densityCombination therapyFracture risk.OsteoporosisSequential therapy

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.