ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
How extracellular vesicles contribute to pulmonary fibrosis: miRNA-mediated mechanisms, diagnostic potential, and emerging therapeutic strategies.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is a progressive interstitial lung disease driven by excessive fibroblast activation and extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, for which pirfenidone and nintedanib slow but do not halt disease progression. Extracellular vesicles (EVs)-lipid bilayer-enclosed nanoparticles that shuttle microRNAs (miRNAs), proteins, and lipids between cells-are increasingly recognized as important mediators and potential modulators of fibrotic remodeling. On the pathogenic side, epithelial- and immune-cell-derived EVs can deliver pro-fibrotic miRNAs (e.g., miR-494-3p) that regulate transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β)/Smad and Wnt/β-catenin signaling, promoting fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition and ECM accumulation. Conversely, selected mesenchymal stem cell-derived EV (MSC-EV) preparations have demonstrated anti-fibrotic effects in preclinical models through modulation of TGF-β/Smad signaling, M2 macrophage polarization, mitochondrial function, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition; a phase I clinical study has provided initial safety evidence for nebulized administration, although therapeutic efficacy in PF has not yet been established. Beyond MSC-EVs, plant-derived and milk-derived EVs have emerged as potential delivery platforms, although their applications remain largely preclinical. Meanwhile, EVs isolated from plasma, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, sputum, and urine carry disease-associated molecular signatures that may serve as candidate biomarkers for PF detection or monitoring, but require further clinical validation. This review synthesizes recent evidence on the dual roles of EVs in PF pathogenesis and therapy, evaluates their potential diagnostic utility, and discusses translational hurdles-including cargo standardization, targeted delivery, and scalable manufacturing-that must be overcome for clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42821136What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.