Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42821160›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2026

Integrative transcriptomic and machine learning analysis identifies candidate biomarkers and immune features in diabetic ulcers.

Yue Jiang, Yunxi Cai, Qingkai Liu, Jingsi Jiang, Fang Shen, Ying Zhang, Xiaoya Fei, Le Kuai, Zhan Zhang, Ying Luo and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yue Jiang *Department of Dermatology, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200437, China.
Yunxi Cai *Department of Dermatology, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200437, China.
Qingkai Liu *Department of Dermatology, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200437, China.
Jingsi JiangShanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Institute of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200443, China.
Fang ShenShanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Institute of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200443, China.
Ying ZhangShanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Institute of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200443, China.
Xiaoya FeiShanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Institute of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200443, China.
Le KuaiDepartment of Dermatology, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200437, China.
Zhan ZhangDepartment of Dermatology, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200437, China.
Ying LuoDepartment of Dermatology, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200437, China.
Jiankun SongShanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Institute of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200443, China.
Xin MaShanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Institute of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200443, China.
Bin LiInstitute of Dermatology, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200437, China. 18930568129@163.com.
Xiaoxuan MaDepartment of Dermatology, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200437, China. 985841171@qq.com.
Yi RuShanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Institute of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200443, China. pansy022@hotmail.com.

Funding

the Clinical Transformation Incubation Program in Hospital lczh2023-01the High-level Chinese Medicine Key Discipline Construction Project (Integrative Chinese and Western Medicine Clinic) of the National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine zyyzdxk-2023065the "Medicine + X" Interdisciplinary Research Project 2025-0650-ZD-01the National Key Research and Development Program of China 2024YFC3505304the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 82374444the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 82405388the National Qi-Huang scholar [2025] No. 182the Shanghai Association of Traditional Chinese Medicine Young and Middle-aged Physicians' Haipai Traditional Chinese Medicine Inheritance Research Project 2026-HPZY-10the Shanghai Dermatology Research Center 2023ZZ02017the Shanghai Key Discipline Construction Project of Traditional Chinese Medicine shzyyzdxk-2024104the Shanghai Oriental Talents Program Youth Project (Health Platform) QNWS2024106the Shanghai Oriental Talents Program Youth Project (Health Platform) QNWS2025035the Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital "Hope Star" Talent Training Program 2025xwzx07the Youth Medical Talents -Specialist Program of Shanghai "Rising Stars of Medical Talents" Youth Development Program SHWSRS (2024)_070the Youth Medical Talents Specialist Program of Shanghai "Rising Stars of Medical Talents" Youth Development Program SHWSRS (2025)_071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetic ulcers (DU) are a severe complication of diabetes mellitus and are associated with infection, recurrence, amputation, and excess mortality. Robust molecular markers that distinguish ulcer tissue from non-ulcer tissue and clarify the biological basis of impaired healing remain limited. METHODS AND

resultsPublic transcriptomic datasets were integrated to identify DU-associated genes initially selected from lipid metabolism-related gene sets. Differential expression analysis, random forest modeling, single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA), gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA), drug-gene interaction analysis, and single-cell RNA sequencing were used to prioritize candidate biomarkers. External transcriptomic cohorts were used for validation. A streptozotocin-induced diabetic wound model in C57BL/6 mice was evaluated by serial wound imaging, hematoxylin and eosin staining, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and western blotting. A ten-gene panel comprising ANGPTL4, BNIP3, EEF2K, EIF4EBP1, KLHDC1, KLK10, KLK8, NFIX, QSOX1 and S100A8 showed strong discrimination and reproducible expression patterns across validation datasets. Immune analyses linked the panel to T helper 17 (Th17) cell infiltration and interleukin receptor activity. Single-cell analysis localized these genes to distinct wound-associated cell populations. Diabetic mice exhibited delayed wound closure and greater residual wound widths than control mice. Transcript and protein assays showed concordant changes in representative genes.

conclusionsThese findings identify a candidate biomarker panel for DU and connect its transcriptomic pattern with immune remodeling, cell-specific expression, and impaired wound repair. Further validation in larger human cohorts is required before clinical application.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalDiabetic FootTranscriptomeAnimalsBiomarkersGene Expression ProfilingHumansMachine LearningMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLWound HealingBiomarkersdiabetic ulcersexperimental validationimmune microenvironmentlipid metabolismmachine learningsingle-cell RNA sequencing

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.