ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026
Supporting implementation of the national standards for cancer survivorship care: development of the cancer survivorship maturity model (CSMM).
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe National Standards for Cancer Survivorship Care define the domains of care that healthcare organizations should deliver, yet few tools exist to assess organizational capability and implementation maturity for the National Standards. We developed and preliminarily evaluated the cancer survivorship maturity model (CSMM), a framework designed to assess organizational maturity in real-world oncology settings.
methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods, participatory model development study. A preliminary CSMM was refined through five multidisciplinary focus groups at a comprehensive cancer center using consensus-building techniques adapted from nominal group technique. Participants completed prioritization exercises, contributed to model refinement, and assessed the maturity of survivorship care delivery in their practice settings. Qualitative analysis identified model refinement needs and implementation barriers. The final model was distributed to external stakeholders for preliminary evaluation.
resultsFourteen internal participants and 12 external respondents contributed to model development and evaluation. The final CSMM included seven domains across five maturity levels ranging from ad hoc to optimized. Participants identified differences in prioritization across clinical impact, implementation feasibility, and perceived patient importance. Participants' assessment of survivorship care maturity was generally low, with most domains clustering between levels 1 and 2. Qualitative findings identified barriers, including unclear workflows, limited resources, insufficient time, and technical constraints.
conclusionsThe CSMM provides a structured approach to assess organizational capability and implementation maturity for the National Standards while identifying domain-specific opportunities for improvement. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: By helping institutions target areas for improvement and resource investment, the CSMM may support more consistent patient-centered survivorship care delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42821239What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.