ArticleStem cells translational medicine2026
Haploidentical HSCT vs immunosuppressive therapy for severe aplastic anemia in patients aged 40-65 years: a retrospective comparative study.
Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a life-threatening hematological disorder, and the optimal treatment for patients aged ≥40 years remains controversial. This retrospective study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy (IST) versus haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) specifically in elderly patients. To minimize selection bias, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to pair samples based on age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, thereby addressing treatment responses and survival outcomes while ensuring balanced baseline characteristics between the 2 groups. The study reveals that while overall survival (OS) rates were similar (69.6% ± 13.3% vs. 68.6% ± 12.1%, P = 0.80), haplo-HSCT significantly outperformed IST in terms of failure-free survival (FFS) rates (68.7% ± 12.1% vs. 46.5% ± 20.2%, P = 0.025). Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed that treatment modality and disease severity were independent predictors of FFS. These findings support haplo-HSCT as a viable first-line treatment option for appropriately selected elderly SAA patients, providing evidence for treatment options in patients with SAA aged 40 and above.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.