ArticlePloS one2026
Stakeholder perspectives on adolescent sexual and reproductive health service utilization in Uganda's Busoga region: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdolescents in low- and middle-income countries face high rates of unintended pregnancy, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and unmet sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs. In Uganda, 24% of girls aged 15-19 years have begun childbearing, yet modern contraceptive prevalence among adolescents remains low (15%). These challenges are particularly severe in the Busoga region, where sociocultural norms, poverty, and limited health system capacity hinder access to adolescent-friendly SRH services. Despite national guidelines, utilization remains low. Few studies have triangulated perspectives from adolescents, health providers, and community/religious leaders. We explored stakeholder views to provide an integrated understanding of factors influencing adolescent SRH service utilization in Busoga, Uganda.
methodsAn exploratory qualitative study was conducted in Iganga and Bugweri districts. Four focus group discussions with 38 adolescents (13-19 years), stratified by sex, age group, and residence, and 12 key informant interviews with health providers and community leaders were conducted. Adolescents were recruited through peer networks, while key informants were purposively selected. Data were collected (November-December 2024), transcribed verbatim, and analyzed inductively using thematic analysis with NVivo 14. Ethical approval and informed consent/assent were obtained.
resultsAdolescents, health providers, and community stakeholders described SRH service utilization as shaped by adolescent motivation alongside persistent barriers. Adolescents showed strong preventive intent, but uptake was limited by misconceptions about contraception, fears of infertility, long distances, lack of privacy, negative provider attitudes, and commodity stock-outs. Providers and community leaders echoed concerns around misinformation, limited parental guidance, moral norms, and structural constraints. All stakeholders converged on the need for confidential, accessible, and peer- and community-based adolescent SRH services.
conclusionAdolescents in Busoga are motivated to use SRH services, but intersecting sociostructural and system barriers limit utilization. Strengthening adolescent-friendly services, improving provider responsiveness, addressing misinformation, and expanding community-based delivery are essential to enhance equitable access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.