ArticleFamily medicine and community health2026
Primary care determinants for timely diagnosis of dementia.
Article in Family medicine and community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify actions of primary care physicians (PCPs) that influence referral to specialist assessment for dementia from the perspective of people with symptoms of dementia and/or their significant others.
designA descriptive qualitative design was used, involving 33 semistructured interviews that explored presenting symptoms, consultations with health professionals, tests undertaken and challenges encountered while navigating the prediagnostic phase of dementia. Interview data were mapped deductively to the Candidacy Framework to examine engagement with PCPs and to identify participant-perceived actions that facilitated or impeded timely diagnosis.
settingOnline interviews were conducted between August 2022 and June 2023 with participants across Australia.
participantsParticipants were 37 people who had navigated the dementia diagnosis process as a patient or significant other (partner/spouse, adult child, sibling or friend).
resultSuccessfully communicating concerns and asserting candidacy was described by participants as determining the diagnosis trajectory. Participants reflected that PCPs assessed available information to determine the need for specialist referral. Participants detailed that following PCP referral and support provision, diagnosis proceeded to a specialist. We also identified participant-reported system-level and PCP-related barriers to facilitating a timely diagnosis, including PCP time-constraints and workload-constraints, dementia-specific knowledge and referral pathway inconsistency. From participants' perspectives, access to a specialist referral and timely diagnosis was facilitated or impeded by an interplay of actions by people experiencing symptoms, significant others, and PCPs.
conclusionsPrimary care barriers and enablers to timely diagnosis spanned across patient, significant other, PCP and system levels. Recommendations to provide timely, accurate and equitable dementia diagnoses include (1) Raise community awareness of dementia symptoms, helping people communicate their concerns effectively with their PCP; (2) Enhance PCP knowledge of dementia to improve their ability to refer and diagnose and (3) Develop clear diagnostic pathways to ensure that individuals receive the appropriate diagnosis and care they need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.