Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42823413›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

End-to-end deep learning methods for genetic risk prediction of schizophrenia.

Nora Verplaetse, Yves Moreau, Daniele Raimondi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nora VerplaetseESAT-STADIUS, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Yves MoreauESAT-STADIUS, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Daniele RaimondiInstitut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier (IGMM), Université de Montpellier, CNRS UMR 5535, Montpellier, France. daniele.raimondi@igmm.cnrs.fr.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-23-CPJ1-0171-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schizophrenia is a highly heritable psychiatric disorder with a complex genetic basis. While recent GWAS and whole exome sequencing studies have identified numerous risk loci, existing clinical prediction models rely primarily on linear assumptions, limiting their ability to capture complex, nonlinear genetic effects such as epistasis. In this study, we apply end-to-end genome interpretation neural network models to predict schizophrenia risk using whole exome sequencing data in a cohort of 6,135 cases and 6,245 controls. We show that nonlinear neural networks significantly outperform conventional additive models when sufficient sample size is available. These findings support the fact that high-order genetic interactions between alleles and variants should be considered by clinical and quantitative genetics models. To investigate the decision process our models follow, we integrate explainable AI techniques and biological priors into our models, using them to identify predictive genes and pathways. Our approach recovers both known schizophrenia risk genes and recommends BASP1 as a potential understudied schizophrenia gene involved in neuronal development.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseSchizophreniaExome SequencingGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansModels, GeneticNeural Networks, ComputerPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning Models

Identifiers

PMID42823413
PMCPMC13631334

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.