ArticleNature communications2026
End-to-end deep learning methods for genetic risk prediction of schizophrenia.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- End-to-end deep learning methods for genetic risk prediction of schizophrenia.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Schizophrenia is a highly heritable psychiatric disorder with a complex genetic basis. While recent GWAS and whole exome sequencing studies have identified numerous risk loci, existing clinical prediction models rely primarily on linear assumptions, limiting their ability to capture complex, nonlinear genetic effects such as epistasis. In this study, we apply end-to-end genome interpretation neural network models to predict schizophrenia risk using whole exome sequencing data in a cohort of 6,135 cases and 6,245 controls. We show that nonlinear neural networks significantly outperform conventional additive models when sufficient sample size is available. These findings support the fact that high-order genetic interactions between alleles and variants should be considered by clinical and quantitative genetics models. To investigate the decision process our models follow, we integrate explainable AI techniques and biological priors into our models, using them to identify predictive genes and pathways. Our approach recovers both known schizophrenia risk genes and recommends BASP1 as a potential understudied schizophrenia gene involved in neuronal development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.