ArticleBMC health services research2026
Patients' experiences of musculoskeletal pain self-management and perspectives on virtual physiotherapy in Saudi Arabia: a reflexive thematic analysis.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with musculoskeletal (MSK) pain in Saudi Arabia frequently employ self-directed management strategies in the absence of timely professional physiotherapy. This qualitative study was conducted as the first phase of a research programme investigating virtual MSK self-management in Saudi Arabia. Its findings subsequently informed the development and design of a hybrid virtual self-management programme for low-risk MSK patients.
methodsEight gender-separated focus groups (n = 36) were conducted in Arabic at a tertiary care facility in Riyadh between July and October 2025. Sessions were held in-person or via Zoom. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim using automated transcription (TurboScribe AI) as a first-pass tool, and the resulting transcripts were subsequently verified line by line by the research team. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's six-phase framework. The study is reported in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).
resultsFour interconnected themes were constructed: (1) Self-Management Without Structured Guidance - patients enacted symptom-driven strategies as rational responses to delayed professional care access; (2) Barriers to Physiotherapy Engagement and Adherence - structural, psychological, and relational factors disrupted access and adherence; (3) Limited Health Literacy and Educational Needs - community and individual knowledge gaps were identified, including a culturally specific educational need that has received limited attention in the MSK self-management literature for guidance on adapting Islamic prayer (Salah) during MSK pain; and (4) Conditional Acceptance of Virtual and Hybrid Physiotherapy Models - participants generally preferred hybrid care in which virtual delivery served as follow-up after in-person assessment and technique acquisition, not as an entry point to rehabilitation.
conclusionsPatients described relying on informal self-management strategies, which they attributed to the systemic lack of timely access to professional care. To our knowledge, a culturally specific finding that has received limited attention in the musculoskeletal self-management literature is patients' need for guidance on adapting Islamic prayer (Salah) during MSK pain. These findings informed the development of a culturally adapted hybrid virtual self-management programme, with implications for patient education and physiotherapy service design at the study institution and similar tertiary settings in Saudi Arabia, aligned with the national Vision 2030 health strategy. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.