Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42823755›Full record

ArticleDiabetes/metabolism research and reviews2026

Abdominal MRI-Derived Liver, Visceral Fat, and Pancreatic Phenotypes Improve Prediction of Incident Type 2 Diabetes.

Ruotong Peng, Xuyang Diao, Yiwen Dai, Jingxin Chen, Linqing Zhu, Menghan Zhu, Xinqing Yang, Yang Pan, Yuling Liu, Darui Gao and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ruotong PengDepartment of Health and Chronic Disease Management, School of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5550-4853
Xuyang DiaoDepartment of Health and Chronic Disease Management, School of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yiwen DaiDepartment of Health and Chronic Disease Management, School of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2036-4285
Jingxin ChenDepartment of Health and Chronic Disease Management, School of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4428-8398
Linqing ZhuDepartment of Health and Chronic Disease Management, School of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9762-4604
Menghan ZhuDepartment of Health and Chronic Disease Management, School of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4619-6464
Xinqing YangDepartment of Health and Chronic Disease Management, School of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4098-8634
Yang PanDepartment of Health and Chronic Disease Management, School of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yuling LiuDepartment of Health and Chronic Disease Management, School of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Darui GaoDepartment of Health and Chronic Disease Management, School of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7993-0048
Yanyu ZhangClinical Research Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3354-7064
Mengmeng JiClinical Research Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Wuxiang XieClinical Research Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7527-1022
Fanfan ZhengDepartment of Health and Chronic Disease Management, School of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2767-2600

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82373665Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences 2021-RC330-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo evaluate whether abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived metabolic phenotypes improve the opportunistic prediction of incident type 2 diabetes (T2D) beyond clinical risk models. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study included 36,833 UK Biobank participants who underwent abdominal MRI and were free of T2D at imaging baseline. The original Cambridge Diabetes Risk Score (CDRS) was evaluated, and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was added to form the clinical CDRS model. MRI phenotypes were selected using a LASSO-based selection-frequency analysis and added to construct the clinical CDRS-MRI model. Model performance was assessed in an internal validation set using Harrell's C-index, continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

resultsDuring a median follow-up of 7.38 years, 570 participants developed incident T2D. The selection-frequency analysis retained four MRI phenotypes: liver proton density fat fraction, liver volume, visceral fat volume, and pancreas volume. In the internal validation set, C-indices were 0.765 (95% CI, 0.731-0.800) for the original CDRS model, 0.820 (95% CI, 0.786-0.849) for the clinical CDRS model, and 0.849 (95% CI, 0.818-0.877) for the clinical CDRS-MRI model. The clinical CDRS-MRI model improved the C-index by 0.084 versus the original CDRS model and by 0.029 versus the clinical CDRS model, with a continuous NRI of 56.2% (95% CI, 40.6%-70.0%) and an IDI of 0.022 (95% CI, 0.010-0.037).

conclusionsAbdominal MRI-derived phenotypes improved the prediction of incident T2D beyond established clinical risk models. These findings support secondary use of available abdominal MRI data for metabolic risk stratification, pending external validation.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Intra-Abdominal FatLiverMagnetic Resonance ImagingPancreasAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypePrognosisRisk FactorsBiomarkersabdominal MRIopportunistic imagingprediction modelrisk stratificationtype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID42823755

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.