ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
White and gray matter diffusion-derived differences in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a free-water-corrected diffusion MRI study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is frequently accompanied by complex brain microstructural abnormalities and cognitive decline. Conventional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics can reflect both tissue diffusion properties and extracellular free-water effects, complicating the interpretation of T2DM-related brain changes. We aimed to characterize free-water-corrected diffusion alterations in white matter (WM) and cortical gray matter (GM) and examine their associations with cognitive performance and fasting blood glucose. Methods: We enrolled 48 patients with T2DM and 48 healthy controls (HCs). Diffusion measures included conventional fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD), together with free-water-corrected FA (FAt), free-water-corrected MD (MDt), free-water-corrected AD (ADt), and free-water-corrected RD (RDt), as well as the free-water fraction (FW), estimated using a free-water elimination (FWE) DTI model. Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) was used to evaluate all nine diffusion metrics in WM, whereas gray matter-based spatial statistics (GBSS) was used to evaluate six metrics in the cortical GM skeleton (AD, MD, RD, ADt, MDt, and RDt). Voxel-wise association analyses were performed using FMRIB Software Library (FSL) randomise based on a general linear model with nonparametric permutation testing to examine the relationships of imaging metrics with fasting blood glucose and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, while adjusting for age, sex, and total intracranial volume in the primary models; sensitivity models additionally included diagnostic group as a covariate. Results: Compared with HCs, patients with T2DM showed widespread diffusion abnormalities across the WM and GM skeletons, including lower FAt and higher MDt, ADt, and RDt. No skeleton-wide between-group difference in the estimated FW was detected. In the primary analyses, higher fasting blood glucose was associated with higher FW in selected WM regions and greater cortical GM diffusivity, whereas lower MMSE scores were associated with widespread WM and GM diffusion abnormalities. Conclusions: T2DM-related diffusion abnormalities persisted after free-water correction, whereas no skeleton-wide between-group difference in the estimated FW was detected. Integrating FWE with complementary spatial analyses of WM and cortical GM may help characterize diffusion-derived brain phenotypes and their clinical correlates in T2DM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.