Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42824071›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Development and validation of a LASSO-selected machine learning prediction pipeline for predicting coronary artery calcification in a health check-up population.

Luyu Li, Na Guo, Yuqiang Zuo, Xing Guan, Weinian Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luyu LiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Na GuoDepartment of Geriatrics, Shijiazhuang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Yuqiang ZuoDepartment of Physical Examination Center, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Xing GuanDepartment of Physical Examination Center, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Weinian GaoDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery calcification (CAC) screening in young, asymptomatic populations is clinically valuable but constrained by CT radiation and cost. We developed and calibrated a parsimonious, interpretable machine learning model using routine health check-up variables to identify CAC-positive individuals suitable for early preventive lifestyle counseling. Methods: A total of 4,465 participants were randomly divided into a training set ( Results: LASSO selected 13 predictors: sex, age, pulse, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), serum creatinine (Scr), serum uric acid (SUA), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), smoking, and drinking. The final model achieved an AUC of 0.816 in the training set and 0.771 (95% CI, 0.713-0.824) in the testing set. At the optimal classification threshold, the testing-set sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, NPV, F1 score, Brier score, and AUPRC were 0.726, 0.689, 0.691, 0.102, 0.981, 0.179, 0.042, and 0.147, respectively. Calibration was acceptable in both cohorts. DCA suggested positive net benefit within a low threshold probability range relevant to preventive counseling and further cardiovascular risk assessment. SHAP analysis identified age, sex, hypertension, pulse, and NAFLD as the most influential predictors. Conclusions: The LASSO-selected and calibrated logistic regression model demonstrated acceptable discrimination and calibration for CAC positivity in an internally validated health check-up cohort. Its potential use should be interpreted as preliminary risk stratification rather than clinical implementation, and independent multicenter external validation is required before the model can be recommended for routine clinical use.

Indexed as

coronary artery calcificationdecision curve analysishealth check-upLASSOmachine learningSHAP

Identifiers

PMID42824071
PMCPMC13626897

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.