ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Value of a self-made subcutaneous negative-pressure drain in cesarean delivery: a propensity score-matched cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the preventive value of a self-made subcutaneous negative-pressure drain (5 mL or 10 mL syringe with a scalp vein needle) for wound complications after cesarean delivery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 259 women who underwent cesarean delivery (79 received the drain, 180 did not). Propensity score matching (1:1 nearest-neighbor, caliper = 0.2 SD) balanced baseline covariates (age, predelivery BMI, parity, prior surgeries, intrapartum transfer to cesarean, gestational age). After matching, 71 patients remained per group. The primary outcome was wound erythema/edema or fat liquefaction. Secondary outcomes included postoperative fever, length of stay, antibiotic duration, cost, and operative time. For binary outcomes, Fisher's exact test was used; for continuous variables, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used; multivariable linear regression was applied for adjusted analyses. Results: After matching, no baseline variable differed significantly between groups (all Conclusion: In this small retrospective cohort of an unselected cesarean population (not stratified by BMI or emergency/elective status), we found no evidence that the self-made subcutaneous negative-pressure drain reduces wound complications or improves other clinical/economic outcomes. Given the small number of events, the wide confidence intervals, and residual confounding, these findings are inconclusive: a clinically meaningful benefit or harm cannot be excluded, and routine use of this device cannot be recommended on the basis of the current evidence. Adequately powered prospective studies in predefined high-risk subgroups are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.