SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2026
Clinical value of probiotics as adjunctive therapy for diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To comprehensively assess the clinical effectiveness of probiotic supplementation in individuals with diabetic nephropathy (DN). Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating probiotics for DN were retrieved from eight databases from inception to January 2026. Data on study characteristics, outcome measures, and risk of bias were independently extracted. Meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manager version 5.3, while trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed with TSA version 0.9.5.10 beta. Potential publication bias was examined using Egger's regression test. Results: Nine RCTs encompassing 644 participants met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analyses indicated that probiotic supplementation was associated with significant reductions in serum creatinine (mean difference [MD] -0.10 mg/dL, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.14 to -0.06), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (MD - 2.76 mg/dL, 95% CI - 5.40 to -0.11), fasting plasma glucose (MD - 0.63 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.80 to -0.46), 2-h postprandial blood glucose (2 h PBG) (MD - 0.66% mmol/L, 95% CI -1.10 to -0.22), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (MD -0.40%, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.09), triglycerides (MD -19.17 mg/dL, 95% CI -35.14 to -3.20), total cholesterol (MD -11.68 mg/dL, 95% CI -20.37 to -2.99), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -12.72 mg/dL, 95% CI -18.76 to -6.67), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (MD -1.69 mg/L, 95% CI -2.38 to -1.00), and malondialdehyde (MD - 0.52 μmol/L, 95% CI -0.91 to -0.13). However, no statistically significant improvements were detected in estimated glomerular filtration rate, 24-h urinary protein excretion, insulin levels, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or total antioxidant capacity. TSA supported the reliability of all significant findings except for BUN and triglycerides. Egger's test revealed no evidence of publication bias for most outcomes. Conclusion: Probiotics reduce circulating inflammation and oxidative stress levels in patients with DN, highlighting their potential as an adjunctive therapy, although their effects on glycolipid metabolism and kidney function appear to be modest. Nevertheless, given the limitations of small sample sizes and regional concentration, these findings warrant further validation through multicenter RCTs involving diverse ethnic populations. Systematic review registration: The systematic review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261375372). The registration is publicly accessible at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.