ReviewClinical kidney journal2026
The effects of dialysate acids and divalent ions on calcification and cardiovascular outcomes: old wisdom and new developments.
Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dialysate calcium (DCa) and magnesium (DMg) and the organic acid used in the acid concentrate have a profound combined influence on intradialytic mineral balance and may influence vascular calcification progression and treatment-related symptoms. Whereas Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes recommends a DCa between 1.25 (DCa 1.25) and 1.50 mmol/l (DCa 1.50), the optimal DCa for an individual patient remains uncertain. No consistent mortality difference between DCa 1.50 and 1.25 has been observed. However, DCa 1.50 may induce a positive calcium balance, raising concerns about vascular calcification progression. Conversely, DCa below 1.25 mmol/l has been associated with a higher risk of sudden cardiac death. Compared with acetic acid (acetate dialysate, Acet-D), citric acid (citrate dialysate, Cit-D) reduces calcification propensity of serum, although the effect on vascular calcification progression is inconclusive. Whenever feasible, DCa should be individualized, ideally using estimates of calcium mass balance (CaMB). Because Cit-D generally results in a more negative CaMB than Acet-D solutions at the same nominal DCa, this difference should be considered when prescribing DCa. Increasing DMg from 0.50 to 0.75 mmol/l may improve surrogate cardiovascular outcomes although its effect on clinical outcomes remains to be defined. Overall, Acet-D with DCa 1.25 is a reasonable standard especially when using calcium-containing phosphate binders and in patients at risk for adynamic bone disease, whereas in patients with a high risk of sudden cardiac death, frequent intradialytic hypotension or with severe secondary hyperparathyroidism, DCa 1.50 may be a reasonable alternative. Regarding the choice of acid, the use of Cit-D represents a promising alternative pending further clinical evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.