ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2026
Exploration of a co-care service for chronic care management in patients with hypertension: A participatory qualitative study (Phase 1).
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In Switzerland, more than 80% of diagnosed individuals with hypertension are prescribed at least one blood pressure-lowering agent, yet 60% have uncontrolled blood pressure. To address this burden, co-care has been shown to improve systolic blood pressure control and to be cost-effective. Currently, no co-care service for hypertension management involving pharmacists, general practitioners (GPs), and patients is available in Switzerland. Aim: This qualitative study aimed to identify key elements supporting the future development of a co-care service for chronic hypertension management, informed by healthcare professionals' (HCPs) and patients' perspectives and experiences. Methods: This participatory study included semi-structured interviews with six pharmacists and six GPs, and a focus group of six patients with hypertension. Recruitment targeted diverse Swiss regions and practice settings to capture multiple perspectives and help shape the co-care service. Transcripts were coded using thematic analysis. Results: Pharmacists, GPs, and patients identified effective communication, mutual trust, and clear role differentiation as key elements to support the future development of a co-care service. Structured collaboration tools, such as shared hypertension guidelines, were viewed as necessary to support interprofessional collaboration. Improved information sharing, potentially through an electronic health record, was seen as key to care coordination, although concerns about data security remained. Contextual barriers, including political factors, highlighted the need for local implementation strategies. Conclusion: The key elements of a future co-care service for chronic hypertension management depend on mutual trust, a local and shared way of communication and collaboration among HCPs and patients, combined with a holistic patient-centered approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.