ArticleACS omega2026
VIS-NIR-SWIR Proximal Spectroradiometry Coupled with Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Ornamental Plant Identification and Classification.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-destructive classification of ornamental plant material could improve greenhouse quality control, cultivar screening, and spectral phenotyping; however, most routine decisions still rely on visual inspection. We evaluated proximal VIS-NIR-SWIR spectroradiometry (400-2400 nm) for 900 balanced plant-level leaf or bract spectra representing nine ornamental classes from pothos, poinsettia, geranium, and hibiscus. The spectra formed a highly structured low-dimensional dataset, with the first three principal components explaining 97.11% of the total variance. Full-spectrum and edge-trimmed representations preserved high performance (best macro-F1 = 82.56% and 81.99%, respectively), whereas a ReliefF-selected 16-band green window (547-562 nm) reduced performance to 60.77% macro-F1. Among the full-spectrum deep models, MLP_Deep achieved 80.99% F1. These results show that proximal reflectance enables effective and interpretable plant-level ornamental phenotype classification and discrimination within the present benchmark, whereas compact green-band selection alone cannot replace broader VIS-NIR-SWIR information for closely related foliage classes.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.