ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2026
Delivering online communication skills training for radiation therapists.
Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this project was to determine whether online communication skills training (CST) could be successfully delivered to radiation therapists (RTs) across Australia by adapting RT Prepare CST. RTs' perspectives on the workshop were evaluated as well as determining changes in their confidence in their skills, perspectives on their communication skills "effectiveness" and perspectives about barriers to communicating effectively with people with cancer after the workshop. Methods: Nine online CST workshops based on the original RT Prepare were run for 52 RTs (4-8 in each workshop) working in: Illawarra Shoalhaven, New South Wales; Newcastle, New South Wales; and Hobart, Tasmania. Two facilitators delivered the workshops and all RTs participated in role plays with trained actors. RTs completed baseline surveys and workshop evaluations. Descriptive statistics (pre-post matched) and content analysis were used to analyse data. Results: Forty-seven RTs completed pre-workshop surveys and forty-four of these completed post-workshop surveys. Workshop evaluations indicated participants were satisfied with the workshop. Individual RT confidence in communication techniques and skills were significantly improved after the workshop. RTs' confidence in providing patient emotional care significantly improved after the workshop. RTs highlighted the key skills attained in relation to responding to patient emotions of anxiety, depression, distress and anger. RTs awareness of some sources of support in the treatment environment when providing emotional care to patients was improved after the workshop. Discussion/conclusion: Online delivery of RT Prepare CST provides a practical, scalable approach to strengthening RTs' capacity to prepare and support people with cancer before treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.