ArticleCureus2026
Revisiting Ayurveda for Pediatric Oral Health: A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effects of Coconut Oil and Castor Oil Pulling on Plaque Accumulation, Gingival Health, and Salivary Bacterial Load in Children.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim Oil pulling (OP) has been studied as an adjunct to routine oral hygiene, but pediatric evidence - especially for castor oil - is limited. The registered primary outcome broadly covered gingival health and bacterial flora at two weeks; no secondary outcome was registered. This report compared those components after virgin coconut oil (VCO), virgin castor oil, or distilled-water rinsing. Plaque Index and the direct VCO-versus-castor comparison were exploratory. Materials and methods This exploratory randomized controlled trial enrolled 70 children, of whom 51 met the eligibility criteria and were allocated equally to VCO, castor-oil, or distilled-water groups (n = 17 each). Participants performed the assigned intervention once daily for two weeks. The Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index, the Löe-Silness Gingival Index, and salivary MacConkey-culturable bacterial counts were assessed at baseline (T0) and after two weeks (T2). Intergroup values were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey HSD tests (p < 0.05). Results Forty-five children (n = 15 per group) completed the study. Both oil-pulling groups showed statistically significant reductions in Plaque Index, Gingival Index, and bacterial load from baseline to the two-week follow-up (p < 0.05). At postoperative evaluation, Group B (castor oil) demonstrated the greatest reduction in Plaque Index (3.90 ± 0.46 to 2.50 ± 0.38) and Gingival Index (2.00 ± 0.32 to 0.90 ± 0.28). Bacterial counts decreased markedly in both Groups A and B (from approximately 6.75 and 6.65 to 5.70 and 5.65 × 10³ CFU/mL, respectively), whereas Group C showed negligible change (6.55 to 6.50 × 10³ CFU/mL). Intergroup comparisons confirmed significantly better outcomes in both intervention groups relative to the control. Conclusion Over two weeks, VCO and castor-OP were associated with lower mean plaque and gingival-index scores and lower salivary MacConkey-culturable bacterial counts than distilled-water rinsing. The small sample, baseline imbalances, short follow-up, and restricted microbiological method limited causal and clinical interpretation. Larger trials using baseline-adjusted analyses and oral-microbiome-specific methods are required before routine paediatric use can be recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.