ReviewJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2026
Perioperative Antiplatelet Therapy in the New Flow Diversion Era.
Review in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flow diverter (FD) technology has provided a new concept for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: reconstruction of the parent artery by covering the neck with a braided mesh stent. It has enabled us to treat not only saccular aneurysms but also complex aneurysms that were previously considered difficult or impossible to treat. Despite its clinical impact, FD remains associated with thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications, both of which are closely related to perioperative antiplatelet therapy. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), consisting of aspirin combined with a P2Y12 inhibitor, has traditionally been adopted as the standard strategy to reduce thromboembolic risk. However, the optimal regimen remains poorly defined, and substantial variability exists in clinical practice. Recent evidence suggests that the risk of thromboembolism is highest in the early perioperative period, while prolonged antiplatelet therapy may expose patients to unnecessary bleeding risks without clear additional benefits. In parallel, advances in platelet function testing, the availability of potent P2Y12 inhibitors, and the development of surface-modified FD devices are prompting reconsideration of the conventional paradigm of prolonged DAPT. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of current evidence on perioperative antiplatelet therapy in the context of flow diversion and proposes a contemporary framework that emphasizes temporal risk stratification and individualized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.