ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2026
Reactions to Acrylates in Dentistry and Related Factors - The First Croatian Survey Study on Reactions to Acrylates in Dentistry.
Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Our aim was to examine the potential impact of acrylate exposure and the influence of other associated factors on skin and mucosal changes/lesions among dental professionals and students. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional field study, we used a questionaire to survey 136 participants-including dentists, dental technicians, nurses, assistants, and students-to assess skin conditions and the impact of acrylates on skin and mucosal disorders. Results: A high prevalence of self-reported work-related skin changes in dentistry was recorded, affecting 65% of dental professionals/students, with the highest frequency among dental technicians (78%) and assistants (77%), followed by students (52%) and dentists (49%). Dental technicians were significantly more frequently in daily contact with acrylates (54%) than others (students 13%, dental assistants/nurses 19%) and had a markedly higher prevalence of skin lesions after contact with acrylates (71.7%). The most common manifestations were hand eczema/fissuring (29.4%), facial/neck eczema (14.7%) and periungual dermatitis (11.8%). Those who reported acrylates as an aggravating factor had significantly more facial/neck eczema (p=0.003). Other significant findings: contact with contact lenses and hearing aids was a predictor of periungual dermatitis (p=0.028); contact with artificial eyelashes and hair extensions was a predictor of mucosal symptoms (p=0.006); and the contact with diabetic devices, TENS/ECG electrodes, was more frequently associated with hand eczema/fissuring (p=0.026). Conclusion: Skin lesions in dental professionals and students, particularly dental technicians, are shown to be linked to acrylate exposure in this first Croatian study. Consequently, the implementation of additional protective measures is highly recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.