ArticlePerspectives on medical education2026
CBE and the Missing 'E': Making Competency-Based Education an Equitable Framework for Global Health Professions Education.
Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is generally assumed that competency-based health professions education (CBHPE) is a positive and ongoing educational reform. However, the assumption that CBHPE naturally leads to more equitable outcomes has not been thoroughly examined. This 'Eye Opener' identifies global challenges in implementing equitable CBHPE, with particular attention to majority-world (low- and middle-income) contexts. These tensions include: 1) variable approaches to adoption that limit transferability, 2) uneven infrastructure for implementation and innovation, 3) export of predeveloped conceptual frameworks that may not be locally fit for purpose or implemented alongside collaborative knowledge exchange, and 4) pressures for fidelity in implementation that impede flexibility and compromise effectiveness in local contexts. In each area of tension, the authors outline challenges to equity and suggest potential ways forward. From their analysis, the authors propose that equity must be deliberately embedded in CBHPE at multiple levels, and the proposed solutions include addressing equity on three levels - the micro level of individual learner access and assessment; the meso level of curricula, faculty development, and program learning culture; and the macro level of national accreditation standards and education policies. Examples of opportunities at each level and for each of the five core components of CBHPE are also provided. The authors argue for a shift in perspective-from "outside-in," in which Western nations export CBHPE to the majority world, to "outside-in, inside-out and all around," in which CBHPE frameworks are co-created to leverage contributions from both Western and majority-world education systems. They believe that more thoughtful adaptation and embracing Global South ways of knowing, doing, and being, rather than simple replication, alongside the continuous application of a social justice lens, are needed to ensure that CBHPE serves all communities and contributes to equitable, high-quality learning and healthcare without discrimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.