ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2026
Isometric exercise training and blood pressure control: exploring the dose-response to training frequency in a randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Isometric exercise training (IET) is a time-efficient intervention that consistently demonstrates clinically meaningful reductions in resting blood pressure (BP). The optimal frequency required to maintain these benefits has not been established. This study aimed to (1) examine the dose-response relationship between training frequency and the maintenance of BP reductions following an initial 4-week IET period and (2) investigate the physiological mechanisms underpinning any observed changes in BP. Methods: Adults (n=100) with normal to high-normal BP were randomised into five groups: 3×, 2×, 1× or 0× IET sessions/week following an initial 4-week lower-body IET protocol (3×/week), or control. Haemodynamic and cardiac autonomic variables, including resting BP, total peripheral resistance (TPR), heart rate variability (HRV) and baroreceptor reflex sensitivity (BRS) were assessed at baseline, following the initial intervention (week 4), and following the maintenance period (week 8). Results: All intervention groups showed significant reductions in systolic BP (sBP), diastolic BP and mean arterial pressure (MAP) after 4 weeks compared with control (-9.45±6.69 mm Hg, p<0.001, -5.47±9.92 mm Hg, p=0.007 and -6.80±7.77 mm Hg, p<0.001, respectively). At week 8, the 1×, 2× and 3×/week groups maintained sBP and MAP reductions, although the magnitude of these reductions was significantly greater in the 3×/week group (p<0.001). The 0×/week group showed reversal of BP reductions to levels not significantly different from control. Only the 3×/week group maintained improvements in TPR, HRV and BRS. Conclusions: A reduction in IET frequency to 1-2 sessions per week can partially attenuate the rate at which BP adaptations regress during short-term reductions in training frequency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.