Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42825238›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2026

Isometric exercise training and blood pressure control: exploring the dose-response to training frequency in a randomised controlled trial.

Harry T Swift, Charles Pedlar, Damian A Coleman, John P Buckley, Jonathan D Wiles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Harry T SwiftSchool of Human and Life Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0499-5706
Charles PedlarSchool of Sport, Health and Applied Science, St Mary's University Twickenham, Twickenham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3075-9101
Damian A ColemanSchool of Human and Life Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1861-322X
John P BuckleySchool of Allied Health Professions, Keele University, Keele, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6235-3395
Jonathan D WilesSchool of Human and Life Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7790-8063

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Isometric exercise training (IET) is a time-efficient intervention that consistently demonstrates clinically meaningful reductions in resting blood pressure (BP). The optimal frequency required to maintain these benefits has not been established. This study aimed to (1) examine the dose-response relationship between training frequency and the maintenance of BP reductions following an initial 4-week IET period and (2) investigate the physiological mechanisms underpinning any observed changes in BP. Methods: Adults (n=100) with normal to high-normal BP were randomised into five groups: 3×, 2×, 1× or 0× IET sessions/week following an initial 4-week lower-body IET protocol (3×/week), or control. Haemodynamic and cardiac autonomic variables, including resting BP, total peripheral resistance (TPR), heart rate variability (HRV) and baroreceptor reflex sensitivity (BRS) were assessed at baseline, following the initial intervention (week 4), and following the maintenance period (week 8). Results: All intervention groups showed significant reductions in systolic BP (sBP), diastolic BP and mean arterial pressure (MAP) after 4 weeks compared with control (-9.45±6.69 mm Hg, p<0.001, -5.47±9.92 mm Hg, p=0.007 and -6.80±7.77 mm Hg, p<0.001, respectively). At week 8, the 1×, 2× and 3×/week groups maintained sBP and MAP reductions, although the magnitude of these reductions was significantly greater in the 3×/week group (p<0.001). The 0×/week group showed reversal of BP reductions to levels not significantly different from control. Only the 3×/week group maintained improvements in TPR, HRV and BRS. Conclusions: A reduction in IET frequency to 1-2 sessions per week can partially attenuate the rate at which BP adaptations regress during short-term reductions in training frequency.

Indexed as

Cardiology physiologyCardiovascularExercise physiology

Identifiers

PMID42825238
PMCPMC13629862

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.